Labor officials: Colorado company violated overtime pay laws in 21 Pa. counties | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Labor officials: Colorado company violated overtime pay laws in 21 Pa. counties

Patrick Varine
1535022_web1_web-money8
Tribune-Review file

A Colorado company will pay more than $18,000 in back wages and damages for overtime pay violations in 21 Pennsylvania counties, including Allegheny and Westmoreland, following a federal investigation.

U.S. Department of Labor officials announced Tuesday that Huwa Enterprises, an environmental restoration company based in Keenesburg, Colo., violated overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act between December 2015 and December 2017, when it paid employees bonuses labeled as “per diem,” regardless of the employees’ travel status or distance from home to work.

“For employees who did not have to travel to the job and had incurred no travel expenses, these payments did not constitute reimbursement and should have been included in the calculation when the employer determined overtime rates for these employees,” labor officials said in a release. “Excluding these bonus payments resulted in the payment of overtime rates lower than those the law requires.”

Huwa, doing business in Pennsylvania as Arnold’s Custom Seeding, performed work in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Blair, Butler, Cambria, Clarion, Clearfield, Elk, Erie, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, McKean, Mercer, Somerset, Venango, Warren, Washington and Westmoreland counties.

Huwa Enterprises Owner Corey Huwa said Arnold’s Custom Seeding, a union company, was simply adhering to the tenets of the National Pipeline Agreement negotiated by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Pipe Line Contractors Association.

“We’re under contract to pay people a certain way based on guidelines from the association,” Huwa said. “So we were required to pay per-diem to employees.”

The Fair Labor Standards Act requires that covered, nonexempt employees be paid at least the minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all the hours they work, plus time and one half their regular rates, including commissions, non-discretionary bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week.

It requires employers to maintain accurate time and payroll records.

Huwa paid $9,174 in back wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages, according to labor officials.

“That’s our government for you,” Huwa said. “It’s just kind of interesting that they slap your hand for paying someone too much, and because of that now you have to pay them more, and then you have to pay them double with the liquidated damages.”

“The FLSA requires employers to calculate overtime pay accurately so employees are properly paid, and so that all employers compete on a level playing field,” said John DuMont, wage and hour division district office director in Pittsburgh. “The results of this investigation should encourage other employers in this industry to examine their payroll practices to ensure they comply with the law.”

Huwa said that while the Justice Department’s assertion is technically correct, “if you really look at it, we were doing what we agreed to do in the collective bargaining agreement.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.