ShareThis Page
Man facing prison, fine for leading $2 million counterfeit money ring | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Man facing prison, fine for leading $2 million counterfeit money ring

Chuck Biedka
920484_web1_WEB-pittsburgh-federal-court-building

A U.S. citizen living in the Republic of Uganda pleaded guilty Friday in federal court in Pittsburgh to making and distributing about $2 million in counterfeit money, including more than $200,000 circulated in Oakland, Carnegie and McCandless, prosecutors said Friday.

Ryan Andrew Gustafson, 31, also know as Jack Farrel and Willy Clock, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to make, transfer or sell counterfeit U.S. currency, conspiracy to launder money, and committing counterfeiting acts outside the United States.

Prosecutors say Gustafson lead a counterfeit U.S. currency ring headquartered in Uganda.

In December 2013, the counterfeit bills were being passed in Pittsburgh-area retail stores and businesses and the scheme quickly spread to cities around the country.

The government said the bills were being “advertised, bought and sold on a Dark Net website created by Gustafson called Community-X that was dedicated to the selling and passing of these counterfeit bills.”

According to court information, the ring printed counterfeit $100, $50 and $20 bills, packaged the fake currency disguised as “Give a Child Hope Today” pamphlets, and shipped packages to individuals they met through “online criminal forums.”

Gustafson could receive up to 45 years in prison, a fine of up to $1 million, or both. His actual sentence will be based upon the seriousness of the offenses and any prior criminal history.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.