New lawsuit filed against Glade Run Lutheran claims another boy was sexually assaulted |

New lawsuit filed against Glade Run Lutheran claims another boy was sexually assaulted

Michael DiVittorio

The parent organization that ran a since-closed Zelienople youth home and recently settled a lawsuit filed on behalf of a teenage sexual assault victim faces a new lawsuit of a similar nature.

Attorney Michael Pisanchyn Jr. of the Pittsburgh-based Pisanchyn Law Firm filed the suit this month against Glade Run Lutheran Services, its CEO and corporation on behalf of a 14-year-old Butler boy and his family.

It claims Glade Run allowed the boy to be subjected to repeated sexual assaults by its residents. He is referred to in the lawsuit as “John Doe” and was 9 at time of the alleged assaults.

Glade Run, Pisanchyn and one of his clients settled a lawsuit last month in which Glade Run was accused of allowing sexual and verbal abuse to happen to another boy.

The recently settled lawsuit alleged that Glade Run staff failed to stop or report the assaults and ridiculed the plaintiff, who was 13 at the time. The lawsuit claimed he “suffered serious physical and psychological abuse over an extended period of time.”

The new lawsuit also claims Glade Run staffers ignored John Doe’s pleas for help, and its overnight employees watched TV and slept instead of watching over children.

The new alleged victim was in Glade Run’s care from November 2013 through May 2015, according to the lawsuit.

A May 19, 2014, trip to a nearby hospital revealed a plastic sword was used to assault the boy, according to court documents.

“It is believed and averred that John Doe was subject to repeated sexual assaults from multiple residents at Glade Run during his time there, while unsupervised by staff, where he would be coerced or forced into gang-sex acts in the laundry room and other places at Glade Run,” the lawsuit claimed.

Glade Run provides autism, mental health and educational programs to children at facilities in Allegheny, Beaver and Butler counties.

A residential treatment facility in Zelienople was shut down in late 2015 after widespread abuse among children was reported to the state Department of Human Services.

The state launched an investigation after a call to the state child abuse hotline alleged a group of children were engaging in sexual contact among themselves. The Department of Human Services investigation found that inadequate supervision and staff sleeping or watching television during the overnight shifts in one of the facility’s housing cottages “resulted in the children’s development of a sexual misconduct system that included forcible rape.”

The incidents took place between March and July 2015 and involved eight children between the ages of 8 and 13.

Pisanchyn said via email to the Tribune-Review that no criminal charges have been filed against anyone at the corporation, and his firm continues to pursue justice for the victims.

“We at the Pisanchyn Law Firm intend on bringing the wrath of the law to these corporations who continually put profits over safety to be sure no others have to be in fear of being sexually abused,” He said.

Calls to Glade Run Lutheran Services were not immediately returned.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.