Officials: IUPatty’s police incidents down from 2018, but still plentiful |

Officials: IUPatty’s police incidents down from 2018, but still plentiful

Jeff Himler
Tribune-Review archive
IUPatty’s participants take selfies and talk with members of the Pennsylvania State Police Mounted Patrol as they monitor the intersection of Washington Street and South Seventh Street during the student-planned celebration of St. Patrick’s Day March 21, 2015 in Indiana.

Overall police incidents during the annual IUPatty’s weekend, 7 a.m. Thursday through 7 a.m. Sunday, were down compared to last year, according to officials tracking the incidents in central Indiana County.

The boisterous, three-day celebration thrown by students at Indiana University of Pennsylvania is not sanctioned by the university and has been a sore spot with many in the Indiana area. Students wear green, in recognition of St. Patrick’s Day, although the event often doesn’t coincide with the holiday.

The IUPatty’s weekend prompted owners of Off The Rocks, a restaurant in the 600 block of downtown Indiana’s Philadelphia Street, to close early, at 2 p.m., on Saturday and Sunday, citing an abundance of caution. “Our staff and customer safety is and always will be number one!” the restaurant stated Thursday in a social media post.

In 2017, two off-campus shootings during the festivities left one person dead and three injured.

Indiana Borough Police reported 131 calls for service during the first 48 hours of this year’s extended weekend, up by 15 from the previous year.

Twenty people were charged with drug or alcohol offenses, including 10 IUP students, three non-student residents and seven student visitors not enrolled at IUP.

But between 7 a.m. Saturday and 7 a.m. Sunday, borough police had 89 calls for service, down markedly from 139 calls during the same period in 2018.

There were 18 people charged with drug or alcohol offenses, retail theft, resisting arrest or trespass — including four IUP students, one non-student resident and 13 non-IUP student visitors.

On Saturday and Sunday, borough police had to disperse several large gatherings, according to Michelle Fryling, executive director of media relations for IUP and public information officer for the Indiana Area Collaborative Team that released the police statistics.

Borough police charged a Virginia resident with suspicion of driving under the influence of a controlled substance and carrying a firearm without a license during a traffic stop on School Street.

During the three days, IUP police reported 54 people arrested for drug or alcohol violations, including 21 students and 33 non-students.

State police, who prepared for the weekend with officers mounted on horses, a DUI checkpoint, supplemental roving patrols and aggressive traffic enforcement, reported the hours of Saturday evening and early Sunday were “significantly quieter” than in 2018, according to Fryling. This year, state police issued 25 traffic citations while arresting one person for a drug violation, five people for driving under the influence and one person for public drunkenness.

During the first 48 hours of the weekend, state police reported 233 traffic citations, seven drug arrests, three cases of driving under the influence and one case of public drunkenness.

During the 2018 weekend, state police issued fewer traffic citations — a total of 229 — but made more arrests, including 44 for drug violations, 20 for DUI arrests and 21 for public drunkenness.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.