ShareThis Page
Ohio regulatory approvals bring second ‘cracker’ plant in region closer to reality |

Ohio regulatory approvals bring second ‘cracker’ plant in region closer to reality

Stephen Huba
| Monday, January 7, 2019 4:10 p.m
Royal Dutch Shell
An artist’s rendering of what Royal Dutch Shell’s ethane "cracker" plant in Beaver County might look like when completed.

Southeastern Ohio has moved closer to joining Southwestern Pennsylvania as the location of an ethane “cracker” plant that could be a boon for employment for the natural gas industry and plastics manufacturers.

The proposed plant near Shadyside, Ohio, in Belmont County, cleared its final regulatory hurdles in late December, when the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency announced the approval of air and water pollution discharge permits.

The approval came at about the same time the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection approved permits for a pipeline that will serve the ethane cracker plant being built on the banks of the Ohio River in Potter Township, Beaver County.

Royal Dutch Shell is building the $6 billion facility near Monaca with a view toward using ethane from the Marcellus and Utica shale reservoirs and processing it into ethylene and, finally, polyethylene for the plastics industry.

The Ohio plant, if built, will occupy the former R.E. Burger Power Station south of Shadyside, also on the Ohio River. Although PTT Global Chemical and its partner, the South Korea-based Daelim Industrial Co., have purchased 500 acres for construction, no formal announcement has been made.

The partnership, announced about a year ago, nearly doubled the amount of ethylene the plant would be able to produce. PTT Global Chemical first expressed interest in the Ohio site in 2015.

Although the Beaver County project received its air and water permits in June 2015, Royal Dutch Shell did not make a final decision until June 2016 — more than four years after it picked a site at a shuttered zinc smelter along the Ohio River.

Construction began in earnest in late 2017 and is expected to be completed in 2020.

Industry experts believe the Marcellus and Utica shales in the Appalachian basin contain enough ethane to sustain several petrochemical plants.

In December, the U.S. Department of Energy released a report calling on the establishment of a second ethane storage and distribution hub in Appalachia to complement the one on the Gulf Coast.

The United States is now the top producer of oil and natural gas in the world, with an additional benefit in the form of increased natural gas liquids such as ethane. Ethane production in the Appalachian basin is projected to continue its rapid growth through 2025 to a total of 640,000 barrels per day, more than 20 times greater than just five years ago, the report said.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.