Peoples, Equitable natural gas customers to see rate increases under PUC settlement | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Peoples, Equitable natural gas customers to see rate increases under PUC settlement

Brian C. Rittmeyer
1768904_web1_web-naturalgas

State regulators have approved a rate increase for Peoples Natural Gas, but lower than the utility had requested.

The settlement with the Public Utility Commission combines the rates of the company’s Peoples and Equitable divisions.

Peoples acquired competitor Equitable Gas Co. from EQT Corp. in 2013.

Under the settlement, the average monthly bill for a residential Peoples customer will increase by 7.5% — or $5.60 — from $74.24 to $79.84. The average monthly bill for an Equitable customer would increase by 12.8% — or $9.05 — from $70.79 to $79.84.

The increase approved by the commission will increase the company’s revenues by $59.5 million, or nearly 9%. In its request filed Jan. 28, Peoples Gas had sought to increase its revenues by about $94.9 million per year, or 14%.

The company previously said it needs the increase to pay for modernizing its infrastructure and continuing greenhouse gas reduction.

Peoples Gas serves more than 622,000 residents and businesses in Pittsburgh and surrounding counties in southwestern Pennsylvania. Public hearings on the rate increase request were held earlier this year.

PUC Commissioner Andrew G. Place issued a statement on the companies’ plans to withdraw their energy efficiency and conservation program. He encouraged the companies to file a revised plan.

Place also recommended that Peoples report at least annually on its revised line extension policy.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.