Perryopolis doctor charged with swapping pills for sex | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Perryopolis doctor charged with swapping pills for sex

Patrick Varine
1714384_web1_1602860-30f22412fbac48ce88ebb9966e3b6362
This Feb. 19, 2013 file photo shows OxyContin pills arranged for a photo at a pharmacy in Montpelier, Vt. A Fayette County family doctor was charged Monday with swapping oxycodone and another opioid in exchange for sexual favors from a patient. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot, File)

A Perryopolis family doctor is charged with 28 counts of swapping opioid medication for sexual favors, according to U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

Emilio Ramon Navarro, 58, of Coal Center was indicted on 29 charges, according to a Justice Department news release.

Between April 2018 and April 2019, Navarro unlawfully dispensed oxycodone and oxymorphone to a person identified only as “A.W.” in exchange for sexual favors, according to court papers.

Navarro also is charged with health care fraud for allegedly billing Medicaid to cover the cost of the drugs.

Navarro was arrested Monday morning and faces a hearing on Tuesday.

If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison for each count of unlawfully prescribing opioids, and up to 10 years for the health care fraud count.

The case was brought by the Western Pennsylvania Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit, consisting of federal prosecutors, and federal and state law enforcement.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.