ShareThis Page
Pitt snares $4.2 million during 24-hour Annual Day of Giving | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Pitt snares $4.2 million during 24-hour Annual Day of Giving

Deb Erdley
832272_web1_web-PittCathedralLearning
The Cathedral of Learning at the University of Pittsburgh.

The University of Pittsburgh posted record participation and $4.2 million in donations Thursday for Pitt’s annual Day of Giving fundraiser.

Pitt officials said a record 6,346 faculty members, staffers, parents, alumni and friends from 50 states and 17 countries made donations. Participation increased by 89 percent over last year.

The annual 24-hour event commemorates Pitt’s founding on Feb. 28, 1787. Donations help underwrite scholarships, research, student activities and new initiatives including the Panthers Forward program that offers $5,000 in federal loan forgiveness to graduating seniors who commit to giving back to the university.

Pitt upped the ante for competition among its schools, programs and student groups this year by offering $200,000 worth of challenges.

Winners in those categories included:

• Schools or Colleges: The School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences received $25,000. Pitt–Johnstown earned $15,000 and Pitt–Greensburg earned $10,000.

• Places, Experiences and More: The Osher Lifelong Learning Institute claimed $25,000.

• Students Organizations: Pitt Club Tennis was first to earn $5,000.

• Athletics: The University Band Fund was first to earn $5,000.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.