Cranberry police: 2 Georgia men busted for stealing, counterfeiting checks from mail |

Cranberry police: 2 Georgia men busted for stealing, counterfeiting checks from mail

Tony LaRussa
Xavier Ferguson (left); Quentavious Price (right)

Two men from Georgia have been arrested by Cranberry police on charges they stole mail containing checks and used the information to create counterfeits that were exchanged for cash, according to authorities.

Quentavious Price, 32, of Lithonia, Ga., and Xavier Ferguson, 24, of Jonesboro, Ga., are accused stealing outgoing mail from businesses, according to Cranberry police Sgt. Chuck Mascellino.

“They appeared to have been targeting mail boxes in industrial parks and using the information on the checks to create counterfeits that were then filled out and cashed,” the sergeant said.

Police said the pair were spotted lifting checks from mailboxes along Route 19 in Marshall and in Cranberry.

The suspects were traced to a motel in Cranberry. Police executed a search warrant there. Investigators found a typewriter believed to have been used to fill out the checks along with 22 counterfeit checks worth more than $53,000.

Some of the checks that were confiscated were from companies in Ohio, where the men are believed to also have been operating.

Price and Ferguson each were charged with more than 50 counts of forgery, conspiracy, theft, receiving stolen property and related crimes.

They remain in the Butler County Jail after being unable to post the $75,000 cash bond set for each of them, according to court records.

The pair are scheduled for preliminary hearings at 10 a.m. May 10 before District Judge David T. Kovach.

Staff writer Brian Rittmeyer contributed to this report.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.