Police: Dog found dead in Belle Vernon backyard had ‘obvious signs’ of starvation | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Police: Dog found dead in Belle Vernon backyard had ‘obvious signs’ of starvation

Renatta Signorini
1340487_web1_gtr-BVanimal
WPXI
Authorities raided a Belle Vernon home Wednesday, June 26, 2019 after reports of a dead dog being found in the backyard.
1340487_web1_gtr-bvanimal2
WPXI
Authorities raided a Belle Vernon home Wednesday, June 26, 2019 after reports of a dead dog being found in the backyard.

A Belle Vernon man and woman are facing animal cruelty charges after a dog was found dead in their backyard Tuesday, according to court papers.

Troopers said the dog had obvious signs of starvation and abuse.

Christopher Michael Foreman, 35, and Rachel Marie Bonacci, 36, allegedly left the dog locked in a cage outside their Main Street home without food or water, police said. Charges of aggravated cruelty to animals, neglect of animals and related offenses were filed Tuesday.

State police said a witness reported seeing a dog struggling to move its head Tuesday morning. The witness told troopers the dog had been locked in the cage for about a month and her repeated attempts to get investigators to check on it were unsuccessful, police said in court papers.

The witness told police there were other animals inside of the house. On Wednesday, troopers removed several animals, Tribune-Review news partner WPXI reported.

Bonacci was arraigned Wednesday. She was being held in the Fayette County Prison on $30,000 bail. A July 3 preliminary hearing is set.

Foreman was awaiting arraignment. Neither suspect had an attorney listed in online court records.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.