Police: Johnstown drug user assaults EMT who saved his life | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Police: Johnstown drug user assaults EMT who saved his life

1349798_web1_PoliceLightsZ

A Johnstown man will appear in Cambria County court, accused of assaulting a 7th Ward Ambulance worker after she saved his life using Narcan, authorities said.

Troy Darin Kendall, Jr., 34, who has addresses of the 500 block of Vine Street and the 800 block of Oak Street, waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Thursday before District Judge Michael Musulin of Johnstown.

City police allege that Kendall suffered an overdose on June 8 at a residence on Osprey Place, according to a criminal complaint.

When police arrived, they found Kendall “laying on the kitchen floor, face up, blue in color and not breathing,” the complaint said.

An officer used “chest compression” and 7th Ward EMS personnel administered two shots of Narcan. Kendall became conscious and then defecated in his pants and on the floor, the complaint said.

Kendall was placed into the ambulance, where he continued to regain consciousness and then spit and shouted vulgarities.

“Kendall punched the EMT who saved his life,” the complaint said.

Police charged Kendall with aggravated assault, disorderly conduct and harassment.

A week later, police arrested Kendall at a Conner Towers apartment where they allegedly found him naked and in possession of a crack pipe.

He was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia. Kendall also waived his right to a preliminary hearing in that case on Thursday.

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.