Retired Pitt professor honored for lifetime achievement in math education |

Retired Pitt professor honored for lifetime achievement in math education

Deb Erdley
Margaret “Peg” Smith, retired Pitt professor honored for lifetime achievement in math education

Margaret “Peg” Smith, a retired University of Pittsburgh professor, was honored Tuesday with a lifetime achievement award for distinguished service to mathematics education from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Officials with the group said Smith dedicated herself to mathematics education and furthering the knowledge of other educators in a career that included teaching stints throughout New York, Ohio and Michigan and in a career capped at Pitt, where she earned her doctorate and became a professor of instruction and learning in the School of Education and a senior scientist at the University’s Learning and Research Development Center.

Smith, who holds the title of professor emeritus at Pitt, retired in 2016.

She also was founding editor of Mathematics Teacher Educator, a journal co-published by NCTM and AMTE. Smith also coauthored one of NCTM’s best-selling books, “5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions.“

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.