Roller coaster at Cedar Point malfunctions mid-ride, passengers stuck for short time | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Roller coaster at Cedar Point malfunctions mid-ride, passengers stuck for short time

Samson X Horne
1298380_web1_ptr-cedarpoint-082218
Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio.

Cedar Point officials say weather caused a roller coaster to get stuck midway through its course, trapping riders Wednesday.

The GateKeeper malfunctioned shortly before the Sandusky, Ohio amusement park was set to close.

Passengers were stuck for more than 90 seconds.

“The train came to a stop on a section of track near the main entrance. The ride’s safety systems engaged as designed and an additional train was stopped on the lift hill,” Cedar Point spokesman Tony Clark told NBC-affiliate WKYC.

Park employees eventually escorted the riders to safety, the station reported.

Video of the incident was posted to Facebook. Footage shows the ride going back and forth.

The post said winds had “suddenly picked up” right before the malfunction.

GateKeeper first opened at Cedar Point in 2013.

It is 170 feet tall at its highest point, goes 67 MPH and is about 2 minutes long, according to the park’s official website.

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.