Several Western Pa. swimming spots fail water-quality tests |

Several Western Pa. swimming spots fail water-quality tests

Megan Tomasic
Tribune-Review file photo
Ohiopyle Falls on the Youghiogheny River at Ohiopyle State Park.

Several area swimming spots failed water-quality tests because of strands of E. coli, according to a Melcroft environmental organization.

The Mountain Watershed Association, which tests popular swimming spots in the region, found 11 out of 14 tested locations failed the test. Swimming, wading and paddling should be avoided to reduce the risk of developing any illnesses.

The organization, which tests water weekly between May 1 and Sept. 30, looks for the bacteria that can cause foodborne and waterborne illnesses.

According to the organization, the Youghiogheny River in McKeesport and in Elizabeth Township failed to meet water-quality standards.

Smithton Beach in South Huntingdon, Butterfly Rock in Layton, Turtle Rock in Connellsville and Ohiopyle did not pass water quality standards, along with Indian Creek in Montgomery County and areas in Confluence, the Pinkerton swim hole on the Casselman River and the Whipkey Dam on Laurel Hill Creek in Somerset County.

Tests on Blue Hole on Morgan Run in Dunbar, Cucumber Run Falls in Ohiopyle and Blue Hole on Blue Hole Creek in Rockwood showed good water quality standards.

Results are posted every Thursday at Notifications on water quality can be received through email or text message alerts.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.