State police in Indiana nab 2 of 5 from ‘Most Wanted’ list | TribLIVE.com
Regional

State police in Indiana nab 2 of 5 from ‘Most Wanted’ list

Patrick Varine
880599_web1_gtr-IndTop5-031519
Submitted photo
State police out of Troop A in Indiana keep a running list of their top-five most-wanted fugitives.

In just over two weeks, state police out of Troop A in Indiana have located and arrested two of the suspects on their “Five Most Wanted” list.

On March 9, troopers took Lamar V. Clemons, 33, of Indiana into custody at a White Township residence. While serving an arrest warrant, troopers discovered a “one-pot” methamphetamine laboratory in a bedroom.

Clemons is charged with drug possession, possession with intent to manufacture or deliver drugs, and improper storage/disposal of chemical waste, all felonies.

Also found in the home and similarly charged was Andrew Walagura, 36, of Renfrew.

Both men were arraigned before Homer City Judge Susanne V. Steffee and remanded to Indiana County Jail in lieu of $100,000 bail, pending a March 26 preliminary hearing before Judge Steffee.

Walagura is not on Troop A’s most-wanted list.

Adam R. Harris, 28, of Indiana was charged Feb. 28 with two counts of drug-related conspiracy. His bail has been set at $5,000 unsecured bond pending an April 9 preliminary hearing before Steffee.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.