State police: Patrols nabbed more drivers impaired by drugs than alcohol | TribLIVE.com
Regional

State police: Patrols nabbed more drivers impaired by drugs than alcohol

Chuck Biedka
1664637_web1_vnd-pspdog2-010419
Chuck Biedka | Tribune-Review
Drug-sniffing dog Beny is one of the dogs on duty for the state police based in Butler Township.

State police arrested 52 people for drunken or drugged driving and confiscated about $17,000 in cash during patrols last weekend in Armstrong, Butler and Beaver counties, according to a report.

Police said one driver led them on a chase early Saturday before he was stopped near Rural Valley in Armstrong County.

Brandon Lee Wilson, 40, of Templeton, is accused of speeding and swerving between lanes. When he didn’t pull over, a trooper said he used a maneuver to turn Wilson’s SUV sideways and stop it.

A criminal complaint said Wilson had a blood-alcohol content of 0.27%, or more than three times the legal limit.

In addition to drunken driving, Wilson is accused of driving while his license was suspended for a previous DUI. Police said he has had two drunken-driving arrests within the past 10 years.

State police Lt. Joseph Glover said more than half of those arrested were accused of drugged driving, while 45% were accused of drunken driving. Some were under the influence of both drugs and alcohol, he said.

In one case, a driver was wanted on outstanding arrest warrants. When a police dog searched his vehicle, troopers said they found marijuana and $11,000 in cash.

Police said they found $6,000 in cash on another driver.

The money was confiscated.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.