Teenager in Uniontown charged as adult after refusing to drop knife, troopers say | TribLIVE.com

Teenager in Uniontown charged as adult after refusing to drop knife, troopers say

Paul Peirce

A Fayette County teenager was charged as an adult Monday with six counts of aggravated assault and related charges after state police say they were called to an apartment complex in Uniontown to break up a street fight and she refused to surrender a knife to police.

Jamayla Jones, 16, had to be subdued with a Taser during the afternoon incident in the parking lot at 49 Pershing Court, according to Trooper Thomas Lizik.

Lizik said in court documents that, when authorities arrived to break up “a large street fight,” witnesses reported Jones was hiding a knife behind her back and she ignored commands to drop the weapon.

Police allege that Cpl. D.J. DeWitt deployed his Taser when “(Jones) advanced on the troopers holding a large knife.”

Jones was arraigned on six counts each of aggravated and simple assault, three counts of resisting arrest and single counts of disorderly conduct and harassment. She was released from custody Tuesday after posting $75,000 bond. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 15.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.