ShareThis Page
Uber driver accused of trying to kidnap female passengers | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Uber driver accused of trying to kidnap female passengers

Megan Guza
1146811_web1_CopLights10

An Uber driver allegedly kidnapped two women early Saturday morning, taking the women to a Point Breeze intersection and trying to lock them in the vehicle, according to Pittsburgh police.

Officers responded about 1:30 a.m. to the intersection of South Homewood and Penn avenues where two women reported their Uber driver kidnapped them, said Public Safety spokesman Chris Togneri.

He said the driver was identified using his Uber app identification and photo.

Court records identified the man as 37-year-old Richard Lomotey, of Monaca.

The women told police that Lomotey commented on their looks and “did not follow the GPS directions to the requested address,” Togneri said.

Lomotey allegedly pulled over near the intersection, put the car in park and told the women, “You’re not going anywhere,” Togneri said. He allegedly tried to lock the doors, but one woman leapt from the backseat and the other woman followed.

Lomotey is charged with two counts each of kidnapping, false imprisonment and harassment.

Court records indicate that he was not in custody as of 7 p.m. Saturday.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.