USDA funds available to communities trying solve stormwater runoff problems |

USDA funds available to communities trying solve stormwater runoff problems

Stephen Huba
A detention pond off of Buena Vista Drive in Murrysville.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is offering grants to small, rural communities to help them deal with stormwater runoff problems.

USDA announced on Monday the latest round of grants awarded through its Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program.

Rural communities, water districts and other eligible entities can use the funds for drinking water, stormwater drainage and waste disposal systems. The projects must be in rural communities with 10,000 or fewer residents.

Funding, whether low-interest loans or grants, is available to qualified applicants who are not otherwise able to obtain commercial credit on reasonable terms, including most state and local governments, private nonprofits and federally-recognized tribes.

Funds may be used to finance the acquisition, construction or improvement of drinking water sourcing, treatment, storage and distribution; sewer collection, transmission, treatment and disposal; solid waste collection, disposal and closure; and stormwater collection, transmission and disposal.

In Pennsylvania, municipalities with a municipal separate storm sewer system, or MS4, must develop a pollutant reduction plan with a goal toward reducing pollution in state waters or reducing discharges into the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Murrysville is in the process of retrofitting a half-dozen detention ponds so that they will hold more stormwater for a longer period time.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.