Washington man, 24, won’t get death penalty for killing man during botched gun robbery | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Washington man, 24, won’t get death penalty for killing man during botched gun robbery

Natasha Lindstrom
906360_web1_JuryCourtroom

A Washington County man convicted of murdering a partially deaf and blind man while trying to rob him of a gun collection six years ago will not face the death penalty, a jury decided.

A jury of six men and six women sentenced Brandon Wolowski, 24, to life in prison without parole after deliberating for several hours Tuesday.

Prosecutors had called for capital punishment via lethal injection.

Last week, the same jury found Wolowski guilty of first-degree murder in the 2013 death of Matthew Mathias, 37.

Defense attorney Noah Geary said he plans to appeal.

Prosecutors said Wolowski shot and killed Mathias and also shot Mathias’ girlfriend, Michelle Powell. Powell survived and testified during the jury trial.

Wolowski was 18 when he entered Mathias’ house in the city of Washington on Jan. 8, 2013 intending to steal guns he knew were kept inside, prosecutors said.

Powell told jurors that Wolowski, who knew Powell and Mathias, brought crack cocaine to their home before pointing a gun at the couple and demanding Mathias’ guns, which were kept in a locked safe in a hallway, the Observer-Reporter reports.

Police found Mathias, who was shot in the back, in the home’s front yard. He died shortly later at a hospital.

Powell was shot in the face, chest and arm.

In seeking capital punishment, Washington County prosecutors cited the wounding of Powell and the fact that the slaying occurred during commission of a felony.

Wolowski’s defense argued against the death penalty, citing Wolowski’s troubled upbringing and trauma that hindered his development and made him unable to think like a mature a adult. Wolowski was born with fetal alcohol syndrome and was in and out of foster homes throughout his childhood, his defense attorneys said.

Geary, one of the court-appointed defense attorneys, cited a 911 dispatch transcript says Powell called for help and told police that “her boyfriend shot her in the face.”

Geary also disputed the prosecution’s evidence of a confession and argued that Wolowski should have been allowed to have his attorney present when he was questioned by police.

Wolowski will be sentenced later on three other convictions of attempted homicide, aggravated assault and robbery.

Last summer, Wolowski rejected a plea deal calling for a 40- to 80-year prison term.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.