ShareThis Page

Quaker Valley student-led campaign tackles anti-gay, racial slurs

| Monday, Feb. 19, 2018, 11:00 p.m.
Quaker Valley High School
Quaker Valley High School

Lydia Callaghan has heard all of the Asian stereotypes from her peers over the years: “Oh, they are yellow and squint a lot.”

She's heard it so much that she's gotten used to it. But that doesn't make it OK. And it's not funny.

Members of the Cultural Alliance group at Quaker Valley High School, focused on promoting a more accepting and inclusive school climate, want their peers to know there are some things that are not OK to say.

The group, formed in November, during the changing political climate across the United States by two Quaker Valley seniors who wanted a safe place to talk about issues of culture and race, now is looking to take action.

Through a campaign — called “What's Okay to Say?” — the Cultural Alliance plans to start a dialogue with teachers and students about what's being said in the hallways and classrooms and how those remarks should be addressed.

“It's what people say about a type of race or a type of culture and how they make fun of it or they say something completely incorrect,” said Paige Hall, 17, a senior.

The group is planning two approaches for the campaign: meetings with teachers to talk with them about how they can handle situations where a student makes a racial or sexist remark; and posters and videos for the school to educate students on what they should be saying, versus what they are.

The planning for this still is in the works, school counselor Amy Keller said.

The hope is that this will raise awareness for what is being said and change the dialogue, Keller said.

Members of the group said the moment when a student says something inappropriate can be awkward. Keller pointed out that teachers likely don't know what to say in that instance.

The goal is to address it, quickly, acknowledge that what is said is not OK, then move on, she said. The middle of an academic class isn't necessarily the place to have a large discussion because a student said something inappropriate, Keller said.

“We hope to open up a dialogue,” Keller said.

Students talked about times in class when they were watching videos and classmates made fun of people's accents or muttered remarks about people's religion. It's not commonplace, but it does happen, they said.

“I've seen a lot of kids saying, ‘Oh, that's gay,'” said Callaghan, 14, a freshman. “There are kids who you go to school with who are gay. I don't think that's OK for kids to say.”

Through posters and videos, students will address the issue with their peers.

“The hope is to kind of visualize things, in a sense. Showing, this is what it looks like. You need to know what it looks like to fix it,” said Zahra Udaipurwala, 15, a freshman.

“It's about people not being ignorant and making assumptions,” said Emma Parker, 14, a freshman.

Saying inappropriate things has become “cool,” said Mackenzie Harrison, 17, a senior.

“People think it's cool or hip to be a jerk,” she said. “No, it's not. We all think it's cooler to be nice.”

Keller said the conversations happening at Quaker Valley likely are happening at every school across the country, given the political climate.

“It's just (that) we live in a world where these things are more acceptable, or people think they're acceptable, so they're not being mindful ... of the things they say,” she said.

Stephanie Hacke is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me