Field set for Baldwin-Whitehall school board primary after court decision |
South Hills

Field set for Baldwin-Whitehall school board primary after court decision


The nine-member Baldwin-Whitehall School District Board has five seats up for reelection this year and no shortage of candidates interested in filling them.

Eleven people are running in the May 21 primary. Five of six new candidates are running as a group called Fresh Start, while five incumbents have formed their own slate, Moving Forward.

In March, the mothers of two Fresh Start candidates challenged the nomination papers of the five incumbents and one other candidate, Mike J. Sharp, in court. Petitions to set aside the six candidates’ nomination papers were filed on behalf of Belinda Rosing and Rose Casciato, according to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

The women claimed the nomination papers were fraudulently altered, arguing they did not contain the signatures of valid electors and additional signatures were added after a notary had signed the affidavits, according to Peter Giglione, an attorney and school board member who represented himself and the other four incumbents before the trial court.

“What they were trying to argue was that the notary should not have been permitted to (re-sign the affidavits), even though there’s Pennsylvania case law that says the notary can do that,” Giglione said.

All 11 candidates cross-filed to appear on both the Republican and Democratic ballots.

The court did decide to remove two candidates, Robert Achtzehn and Sharp, from the Republican ballot. Achtzehn did not have enough signatures from Republicans in the district, while Sharp signed his Republican circulator affidavit even though he is a registered Democrat, Giglione said.

After Common Pleas Court Judge Joseph James denied the other petitions, Rosing and Casciato appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, which affirmed the lower court’s rulings.

Gaul Legal LLC, which represented the petitioners, declined to comment on the litigation. Casciato also declined to comment, and Rosing could not be reached.

The candidates

Board members serve four-year terms.

• Mike J. Sharp — partner at New York Life Insurance Company and part-time police officer in North Versailles who also serves on the Baldwin Borough zoning hearing board. A graduate of Baldwin-Whitehall, Sharp and his wife are raising their teenage sons in the district. His name will appear on the Democratic ballot only. Sharp believes his experience, education and training could be of a benefit to the district.

Fresh Start

• Stacy Lynn Bradley — small business owner and director of environmental health and safety for Trophy Energy Services, LLC. She is a graduate of Baldwin High School. Her objectives include enhancing school security and preventing future tax increases.

• Jennifer Rosing Cochran — works as a senior administrator at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. A native of Baldwin, Cochran graduated from Baldwin High School in 1994. Cochran wants to be on school board to help more, understand more and try to make a difference in the lives of children.

• Kathleen Cusick Fenlock — worked as a cancer data specialist at UPMC for 38 years and has recently retired. If elected, her priority is to promote an Individualized Education Program (IEP) for every child in the district.

• Danielle Rebecca Hillgartner — works for Port Authority of Allegheny County as assistant director of rail service delivery. She has three children, all of whom have attended or currently attend Baldwin High School. Hillgartner pledges to keep the entire community involved in decision-making.

• Andrea Casciato Hulsman — a bank officer at Dollar Bank, Hulsman also serves as a board member for the Brentwood Baldwin Whitehall Chamber of Commerce. Her priorities include working to reduce the district’s debt and crafting a budget that does not raise taxes.

Moving Forward

• Robert Achtzehn — has worked in supply chain for 28 years, where he has managed people and large budgets. He has raised two children in Baldwin-Whitehall School District. Achtzehn was voted onto the school board in the spring of 2018. Achtzehn is running because he loves the district and his children have had positive experiences as students. His name will appear on the Democratic ballot only.

• Anthony DiCesaro — has practiced as a chiropractor for two decades and is the proprietor of Whitehall Health Centre. He has a son who attends school in the district. DiCesaro currently serves as first vice president of the school board. DiCesaro believes “if we put the welfare of the children first and the community as a whole a close second, we cannot fail.” He was elected in 2015.

• Peter Giglione — attorney for the law firm Massa Butler Giglione and has two daughters who are students in the Baldwin-Whitehall School District. Giglione has pledged to always make sure parents’ voices are heard by the board. He was appointed to the school board in September 2018.

• Dan Knezevich — a logistics manager at Schneider’s Dairy, Knezevich is a graduate of Baldwin High School. Knezevich ran for the board in the hopes of being able to make a significant change. He believes in the superintendent’s vision of providing students with a quality education. He has raised two daughters in the district. Knezevich was elected to the school board in 2015.

• Janice Tarson — currently works as a registered nurse and has two children who have attended school in the district. Tarson is committed to keeping the district curriculum pertinent for success in the 21st century. Tarson was elected to the school board in 2015.

Categories: Local | South Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.