West Jefferson Hills revisiting field trip policy | TribLIVE.com
South Hills

West Jefferson Hills revisiting field trip policy

West Jefferson Hills Administration Building

West Jefferson Hills School District leaders are considering revamping rules for field trips to ensure students aren’t missing too much class time.

Administrators have recommended revisions to the district’s field trip policy to keep them from taking students out of class for more than two days at a time. However, at their March 26 meeting, some board members raised concerns with putting a specific number in the policy.

Board members ultimately removed the policy revisions from the agenda and asked administrators to rework it and bring it back for a vote next month.

The goal is not to restrict students from taking field trips, Superintendent Michael Ghilani said.

“It’s just to be more thoughtful and purposeful in when we take them, how long we take them and what the benefit is considering the cost of missing instructional time,” he said.

The superintendent said the district is looking to cut back on field trips that sometimes last as long as seven days, when they could be shortened or done over long weekends to lessen the amount of class time students are missing. Many of these field trips occur in March, April and May, the time leading up to state and advanced placement testing.

“We’ve looked at field trips here, and we want them to be purposeful,” he said. “We just don’t want kids missing school. That’s all. We still believe the band can go to Disney. We still believe the baseball and softball teams can travel, but they just need to be a little more thoughtful with how they do that.”

Some board members found the two-day limit to be arbitrary.

“My expectation is that the administration is doing due diligence and working with the teachers on this type of thing. I don’t know that we need to have a policy stating two days. I’m admittedly against that,” board member Jill Bertini said.

Board members agreed field trips should have an educational value.

Revising the policy gives the district the opportunity to create guidelines for what types of instruction needs to occur on a field trip if it’s going to keep students out of the classroom for more than two days per field trip, board member Kimberley Finnerty said.

“I think there’s opportunity here to improve what we’re doing currently, but maybe just have a little more thoughtful discussion around how to better set up the guidelines,” she said.

Ghilani agreed there needs to be a caveat if students are attending workshops, adjudications or if it’s the only time a program is offered. Such circumstances could result in a student attending a field trip that keeps them out of school for longer than two days, he said.

Erin Gramm, a 2013 Thomas Jefferson graduate, raised concerns about making cutbacks to field trips. A high school field trip to Allegheny General Hospital she took at TJ to watch a live surgery is “one of the main reasons” she’s on the path to becoming a doctor today, she said.

She talked about numerous other field trips she took during her time in West Jefferson Hills that helped shape her life.

Ghilani said field trips like the one to AGH will not be affected. Longer trips, he said, could occur over long weekends or spring break. Parent Lori Danen pointed out costs could be high if the band were to head to Disney on a weekend, and students could miss a religious holiday with their families if the trip occurred over Easter.

“If you give people guidelines, it ensures that things are fair and equitable,” Ghilani said. “I don’t want to be accused of favoring athletics or favoring the arts. I’d rather have sensible guidelines, and I think two days are very sensible.”

The school board will meet next for a work session on April 16 at 7:30 p.m. in the Thomas Jefferson High School cafeteria, 310 Old Clairton Road, Jefferson Hills.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.