ShareThis Page
South Hills

Brentwood Council gives go ahead for building design plans

| Friday, March 2, 2018, 11:00 p.m.

Brentwood Council has given the go ahead to its architect, Downtown-based HHSDR Architects/Engineers, to proceed with design plans for the new public safety building planned for the former Snee Dairy site.

But, council agreed to have three garage bays for EMS, which increased the price tag of the one-floor building by $100,000 — to $6.5 million, borough Manager George Zboyovsky said.

One question, however, that remains unresolved is EMS' lease payment. Its current lease for space in the existing borough building — which dates to 1915 — expires in December.

The borough contributes $90,000 a year to EMS.

Council chambers and administrative offices will be relocated to the Brentwood Civic Center.

“It is anticipated that the work (for both projects) will be bid in October or November of 2018,” Zboyovsky said.

Both projects are expected to be complete by Spring 2020.

In the interim, the borough is talking to developers about what to do with its existing building.

There have been discussions about transforming the building's first floor, which sits along heavily traveled Brownsville Road, into retail space. The building's upper floors would be turned into apartments.

“The borough will be working in request for proposals from developers to purchase the existing building and develop the site into both retail and apartments,” Zboyovsky said. Council has not yet determined a listing price for the municipal building.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at 412-871-2346, or or via Twitter @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me