ShareThis Page
South Hills

Pleasant Hills considering new municipal building

| Monday, June 11, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

Faced with an outdated municipal building and the need for bigger or reconfigured space, Pleasant Hills Borough officials are exploring whether it makes sense to renovate its current complex, or construct a new building.

“Our building was constructed in the 1960s and is out of date,” Pleasant Hills Mayor William Trimbath said. “Right now, we are in the early stages of deciding whether to renovate or build.”

At a recent meeting to discuss the project, borough officials learned that it could cost around $6 million to renovate the building and as much as $9 million to build a new structure. Officials also are discussing the possibility of moving the Pleasant Hills Public Library into the new municipal building — if it is built.

Pleasant Hills would have to have a bond issue to finance any new construction, Trimbath said.

Besides climbing maintenance costs, the Pleasant Hills building has issues with asbestos. In addition, it needs its air handler, standby generator, plus the chiller and outside lighting and garage doors replaced. The outside concrete also needs replaced and the building's plumbing updated.

“The police department is cramped for space,” Trimbath said. “We are also running out of places to store records.”

Trimbath said the building's community room has become too small to meet demands. A new building would have a larger community room with an updated kitchen.

“We also need to improve accessibility,” said Trimbath, adding the building is not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act standards.

The decision about whether or not to construct a new municipal building likely won't be made untit late fall, he said. To date, no property has been purchased for a potential building, Trimbath added.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at, 412-627-9423. or Twitter @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me