50 years after moon landing, Western Pennsylvania sets sight on return to space | TribLIVE.com

50 years after moon landing, Western Pennsylvania sets sight on return to space

Paul Guggenheimer
In this image provided by NASA, astronaut Buzz Aldrin poses for a photograph beside the U.S. flag deployed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission on July 20, 1969.
The nearly full “super moon” rises above the Cathedral of Learning in Oakland, Sunday Nov. 14, 2016. Another “super moon” can be seen beginning on the evening of Jan. 20, 2019.
The super wolf blood moon rises over the PPG Building in Downtown Pittsburgh Pa. Jan. 20, 2019. Shot from Mt. Washington.
In this 1969 file photo, Apollo 11 astronauts stand next to their spacecraft, from left: Col. Edwin E. Aldrin, lunar module pilot; Neil Armstrong, flight commander; and Lt. Michael Collins, command module pilot.
In this July 20, 1969 file photo, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong, right, trudges across the surface of the moon leaving behind footprints. The U.S. flag, planted on the surface by the astronauts, can be seen between Armstrong and the lunar module. Edwin E. Aldrin is seen closer to the craft. The men reported the surface of the moon was like soft sand and they left footprints several inches deep wherever they walked.
In this July 20, 1969 file photo, Apollo 11 Commander Neil Armstrong walks slowly away from the lunar module to explore the surface of the moon.
In this July 24, 1969 file photo U.S. Navy personnel, protected by Biological Isolation Garments, is recovering the Apollo 11 crew from the re-entry vehicle, which landed safely in the Pacific Ocean on July 24, 1969, after an eight day mission on the moon.
Astrobotic Tribune-Review
A mock up of Astrobotic’s Peregrine Lander, which it intends to use for its first mission to the moon in 2019. The Strip District-based space delivery company shot photos of the lander at the LaFarge Duquesne Slag in West Mifflin and only edited the sky to include the Earth in the background.
John Thornton, CEO of Astrobotic Technology Inc., with Polaris the rover at the Strip District startup’soffice.
An artist interpretation of the Astrobotic Peregrine Lunar Lander with CubeRover.
Peregrine lander
Astrobotic CEO John Thornton
Carnegie Mellon University professor and director of the Field Robotics Center William "Red" Whittaker speaks during a press event unveiling "Andy", a lunar rover built for the Google Lunar XPrize Monday Nov. 24, 2014 at the Planetary Robotics Laboratory at the university in Oakland.
Interorbital Systems
A test launch of a rocket designed by Interorbital Systems in the California desert.
Interorbital Systems
A test launch of a rocket designed by Interorbital Systems in the California desert.
Interorbital Systems
A test launch of a rocket designed by Interorbital Systems in the California desert.
Interorbital Systems
A test launch of a rocket designed by Interorbital Systems in the California desert.
Interorbital Systems
Roderick and Randa Relich Milliron pose in front of a rocket they designed. The couple founded Interorbital Systems.
University of Pittsburgh
Bruce Hapke, a professor of planetary geology at the University of Pittsburgh, holds a vial of moon dust.
The MoonRanger rover being developed by Astrobotic and CMU for a flight to the moon.
An IOS CPM 2.0, the basic building block of NEPTUNE modular rockets, sits on its mobile launch trailer at Interorbital’s headquarters at the Mojave Air and Space Port.
An artist’s rendering of the IOS Lunar Station with petals deployed, a nanolander that can carry four small payloads to the lunar surface.

Like many American baby boomers, Randa Relich Milliron has vivid memories of the Apollo 11 moon landing on July 20, 1969.

The Belle Vernon native was in her early teens as she sat glued to a television set throughout the day and well into the night that culminated in the first men, Americans Neil Armstrong and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, walking on the moon.

“It was the all-consuming focus of my life at the time. Everything else besides that shining focal point was a blur,” Milliron said. “I was proud and excited. It felt like we all had done it. But it also made me want to do it personally. That was the day that ignited the spark that ended up with me having my own moon mission in the works.”

Fifty years later, Milliron points to that day as the catalyst for creating Interorbital Systems, the company she founded with her husband, Mt. Pleasant native Roderick Milliron, in the Mojave desert in California in 1996. Since then they have been working on a commercial rocket system with the long-range goal of a manned mission to the moon.

“The moon has always been our goal,” said Randa Milliron, the company’s CEO.

The Millirons are part of the future of American space exploration that is connected to Pittsburgh in a substantial way, just as it was during the 1960s.

Western Pennsylvania innovators and companies played important roles in landing a man on the moon. Alcoa produced an aluminum hatch door on the lunar module Eagle that Armstrong exited before descending the ladder to reach the lunar surface, while Westinghouse created a camera that could operate on the surface of the moon. It captured Armstrong’s first step on the lunar surface, seen by millions of television viewers around the world.

In 1969, Bruce Hapke, a University of Pittsburgh professor in the Department of Geology and Planetary Science, was as excited as anyone when Armstrong set foot on the moon’s surface.

Six years earlier, shortly after President John F. Kennedy announced the U.S. effort to reach the moon, Hapke published an academic paper that deduced what the moon’s surface would resemble. It was precisely what Armstrong found when he arrived. He said the surface appears “to be very fine-grained as you get close to it. It’s almost like a powder down there, it’s very fine.”

Before Hapke’s paper, NASA had no idea what the surface of the moon was like.

“The moon reflects light in a very peculiar way, unlike most materials, and I thought this might give a clue as to what the surface was like,” Hapke said.

He began to study what controls the way that light is reflected by a surface in different directions.

“After a good deal of work, I discovered that the only material that would do that was very fine-grained powder,” said Hapke. “So, I wrote this up and after it was published, NASA was extremely interested in it because, for the first time, they had something solid to go on in the design of things like astronaut boots and landing pads for space ships and rovers that would roll around on the surface.”

Hapke became part of an advisory panel for later Apollo missions to the moon. He was disappointed when the program ended abruptly after Apollo 17 in December 1972.

“I kept thinking, ‘Here we go, we’re on our way out into the solar system,’ and I was very excited and hoped to be part of that exploration. Unfortunately, it didn’t turn out that way,” said Hapke, now a Pitt professor emeritus who has a lunar mineral — hapkeite — named for him. “We went to the moon and never went back. It’s one of the big disappointments of my life.”

Reasons for stopping the program vary from dwindling interest on the part of the American public to the cost of the Vietnam War, which reduced federal funds for the space program.

But now the U.S. is going back to the moon — and a significant portion of that effort relies heavily on Pittsburgh-area people and institutions.

Think lunar, act locally

Earlier this month, NASA’s Lunar Surface and Instrumentation and Technology Payload program awarded a $5.6 million contract to the Pittsburgh-based company Astrobotic and its partner, Carnegie Mellon University, to develop an autonomous lunar rover.

The 13-kilogram rover known as MoonRanger is being developed to provide high-fidelity 3-D maps of the moon’s surface in areas such as polar regions and lunar pits. Carnegie Mellon also plans to send a smaller, toaster-oven-sized CubeRover, also known as the CMU rover, aboard a lander built by Astrobotic to the moon in 2021.

It will make CMU the first university in the world to put a robot on another planetary body.

“Who would have guessed that we would be the ones leading America back to the moon,” said Carnegie Mellon professor Red Whittaker, pioneer of the new technology essential for exploring lunar pits, characterizing ice, investigating magnetic swirls and deploying future mobile instruments on the lunar surface.

As part of the 50th anniversary celebration of Apollo 11, Astrobotic’s Peregrine lander is on display this weekend on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.

Astrobotic CEO John Thornton says Apollo 11 accomplished an amazing feat, especially considering the technology of 50 years ago.

“They had the incredible inventiveness and creativity to do as much as they possibly could do with what they had,” Thornton said. “To accomplish something like that is just remarkable.

“They had 450,000 people [employees and contractors] working for NASA developing many of the components that would fly the Apollo lander for the very first time. These components didn’t exist, like the flight computer and the sensors and the avionics and things that were needed to land. Nowadays there is a whole array of components you can just buy off the shelf.”

Thornton says Apollo 11 created the building blocks for the space industry that exists today. For Astrobotic, the goal is to land commercial payloads on the moon.

There is also a new Trump administration plan for returning humans to the moon. Instead of the original NASA target date of 2028, the schedule now calls for a manned mission within five years.

Whittaker, who described the Apollo 11 mission as the “pinnacle of human and technological achievement,” said the future of moon exploration will be as much about robots as humans. Robots, with “their innate advantages,” will end up doing a lot of the work, he said.

“With humans, you’ve got to feed them, you’ve got to keep them breathing. You need time out for sleep. With robots you don’t have the self-maintenance,” Whittaker said.

Whittaker noted the enormous risks taken with the Apollo astronauts, including the potential of exposing them to high levels of radiation from sun flares that can occur spontaneously.

”There is nothing in the little lander or little spacecraft that’s going to protect you from that kind of high-energy radiation. But they lucked out because they didn’t have the sun flares,” Whittaker said. “You see that again and again and again at that intersection of human and technical pursuit.”

Whittaker said the results of the Apollo 11 moon landing sharpened his focus on what he wanted to do with his life.

“It just transformed my view of space exploration and the technologies that go into it. I knew then that I would be a part of it in some way.”

On to Mars, and beyond

Hapke said the moon could play an important role in getting people to Mars.

“I hope we’ll see a man on Mars before I die. NASA’s original plan had men on Mars in 1993,” Hapke said.

Hapke said a good way to reach Mars would be to build a space station on the moon and launch from there. He envisions astronauts and equipment being ferried up from Earth and rockets being refueled on the moon. One thing you wouldn’t have to haul up would be hydrogen and oxygen, which are the primary fuel in rockets.

“You can make hydrogen and oxygen from water. There is evidence of water in permanently shadowed craters, so that would be a natural resource we could utilize if we built a base on the moon,” Hapke said.

“That would save a lot in the size of the rocket you would need to launch. If you launched a rocket from the Earth to Mars, it would have to be a lot bigger than if you launched one from the moon,” he added. “That’s a primary reason for building a base on the moon.”

Meanwhile, in the California desert, the Millirons are making plans to take that vision a little further with a lunar colonization program involving their own NEPTUNE rockets carrying adventurous people back and forth from the moon. They said it would begin with a manned flight within 10 years.

“We want to set up a commercial colony on the surface of the moon, whereas NASA would be more like an Antarctic research station with no frills. We want to have living areas and night clubs and casinos,” Roderick Milliron said.

“We want to have all the cool things that you would want at a resort destination,” Randa Milliron added. “It will have the feel of a military base and a luxury resort, a high-adventure resort.”

The Millirons said their flights will range from $2 million to $5 million per person — relatively affordable for the average high-net-worth individual.

“The NASA cost is always going to be astronomically high. Very few people or entities can afford to use NASA’s space launch system at the price they charge. You practically have to be a nation to use it,” Randa Milliron said.

“We would like to be the Southwest Airlines of spaceflight because this is a bargain, no-frills class of space travel. We had to pick up the mantle essentially. We had to do this thing and that’s what we’ve been doing for the last two decades, working towards that goal,” she said.

And to think that it all started with “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.