7 face charges in connection with brawls at Harmar hotel | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

7 face charges in connection with brawls at Harmar hotel

Madasyn Lee
Harmar police said they were called Sunday to the Days Inn about a large fight in the parking lot.

Seven people, including a man who claimed to be a Pittsburgh police officer, are facing charges in connection with what Harmar police described as drunken fights at a Harmar hotel over the weekend.

Harmar police said they were called Sunday to the Days Inn about a large fight in the parking lot.

The fighting stopped briefly after responding officers flashed their emergency lights and talked with those involved, but people in the crowd “started to become belligerent again due to the fact that all parties were heavily intoxicated,” according to a criminal complaint.

As officers reviewed surveillance footage and talked with witnesses, another fight involving up to 20 people broke out, the complaint said.

Surveillance footage of the second fracas showed that a man later identified as Corey James Zapf, 24, of Glassport tried to punch another person in the face while on the second floor of the hotel and a “large scrap” ensued, the complaint said. During the fighting, a pregnant woman could be seen getting hit in the stomach by a person falling after being punched, according to the complaint.

After police broke up the second fight and detained several people, the complaint said a man identified as Shane Sullivan, 31, of Darlington, Beaver County, approached the officers and said he was a Pittsburgh police officer. The complaint said Sullivan appeared to be intoxicated, ignored orders to return to his room and tried to push past officers at the scene before attempting to jump off a second-story ledge. Police said they arrested him.

A Pittsburgh police spokesman said Tuesday there was no record of Sullivan working for the department.

A criminal complaint said police intended to file charges against seven people. As of Tuesday afternoon, online court records showed police had filed charges against five of them:

• Zapf faces charges of inciting a riot, simple assault, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

• Adam Kenneth Schroder, 23, of Port Vue was charged with simple assault, harassment, disorderly conduct, public drunkenness and criminal mischief.

• Daniel Mawritz, 24, and Steven Ray Vavra, 26, both of Glassport, were charged with simple assault, harassment, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

• Sullivan was charged with disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.