Route 366 in Lower Burrell to re-open to 2 lanes Friday or early next week |
Valley News Dispatch

Route 366 in Lower Burrell to re-open to 2 lanes Friday or early next week

Mary Ann Thomas
Madasyn Lee | Tribune-Review
The Route 366 bridge in Lower Burrell that has been replaced will soon re-open to two-way traffic after an almost five-month project.

PennDOT could reopen the Route 366 bridge near Millers Lane in Lower Burrell to two-lane traffic as early as Friday or early next week, according to Valerie Petersen, PennDOT spokeswoman.

Route 366, also known as Greensburg Road in Lower Burrell, has been limited to one-lane of traffic regulated by a temporary traffic light because of the nearly $1 million bridge replacement project that began in June.

“We are waiting for to get the weather conditions to apply the final pavement markings and some other small items,” Petersen said.

The 13,000 daily motorists who use that section Route 366 have been able to access the road but at times have sat in traffic waiting for their turn to use the single, alternating lane.

PennDOT chose to use an alternating lane rather than shut down the road completely at the bridge because of the high traffic volume and the lack of a viable detour.

PennDOT replaced the crumbling bridge because it was structurally deficient. Built in 1939, the bridge spans an unnamed tributary of Puckety Creek. The contractor, Pugliano Construction of Pittsburgh, removed the existing 14-foot slab bridge and replaced it with a 15-foot-long, precast box culvert, plus other work.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.