AG: Freeport man tried to arrange sex encounter with agent posing as teen boy |
Valley News Dispatch

AG: Freeport man tried to arrange sex encounter with agent posing as teen boy

Chuck Biedka

A Freeport man known online as “Verse Dad” was arrested Wednesday night on charges of trying to arrange a sexual encounter with who he allegedly thought was a 14-year-old boy but was actually an agent with the state Attorney General’s Office.

Prosecutors say Scott Alan Speer, 54, of Main Street tried to arrange the encounter through social media.

The state’s Child Predator unit said it obtained a search warrant for Speer’s phone and on it found a message thread between Speer and the agent posing as a boy.

Speer is charged with attempted statutory sexual assault, unlawful contact with a minor and related charges.

He was arraigned online by District Judge James Andring early Thursday and taken to Armstrong County Jail after failing to post $25,000 bond.

According to documents filed in the case, police say they arrested Speer when he arrived at a pre-determined meeting place. Investigators said Speer waived his Miranda rights and spoke with agents, during which he admitted to arranging the meeting for the purpose of having sex with a 14-year-old boy.

The Child Predator unit has made 190 arrests since 2017, including 75 last year. Anyone who has information about a child predator can contact the state’s Child Predator Hotline at 1-800-385-1044.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.