Alle-Kiski Pavilion halfway house for state inmates closes in Arnold |
Valley News Dispatch

Alle-Kiski Pavilion halfway house for state inmates closes in Arnold

Mary Ann Thomas | Tribune-Review
The Alle-Kiski Pavilion in Arnold as seen on Thursday, Oct. 17, 2019.

The Alle-Kiski Pavilion, a halfway house along Fourth Avenue in Arnold, has closed because of budget cuts at the state Department of Corrections.

As a result, 35 inmates have been relocated to other facilities.

Alle-Kiski Pavilion, owned by the GEO Group Inc. of Boca Raton, Fla., serves as a halfway house to offenders who are released from state prisons as their sentences are nearing an end. It had a capacity of 60 inmates.

Attempts to reach Arnold Mayor Karen Peconi and community development director Rick Rayburg for comment were unsuccessful.

The state Department of Corrections announced a number of cutbacks in August because of a $140 million budget deficit.

In addition, the corrections department’s inmate population dropped by nearly 1,900. That is the largest one-year decrease in the department’s history, according to a corrections department news release.

“The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections advised GEO in September 2019 that, due to statewide budgetary shortfalls, they would no longer refer clients to the Alle-Kiski facility,” said Monica Hook, vice president of GEO Care strategic marketing.

GEO has not determined how the facility will be used moving forward, Hook said.

The 35 inmates were moved to another facility by the end of September, according to Department of Corrections spokeswoman Maria Finn.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.