Allegheny River locks in Armstrong County closed this weekend | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny River locks in Armstrong County closed this weekend

Mary Ann Thomas
1550745_web1_VND-FeatureBoats-090517
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review

The Allegheny River Development Corp., a Kittanning-based nonprofit that pays to keep the Allegheny River locks open in Armstrong County, announced that Locks 6 through 9 will be closed this weekend.

In 2011, the Army Corps closed the five locks in Armstrong County because of lack of commercial traffic, opening them only for commercial vessels by appointment.

But the ARDC stepped in and cut a unique deal with the Corps, agreeing to pay the Corps to operate four of them on summer weekends and holidays for pleasure boaters.

Those four are: , one in South Buffalo (Clinton lock, No. 6), West Kittanning (No. 7), Boggs (Mosgrove lock, No. 8) and Madison townships (Rimer lock, No. 9).

Brian Szep, vice president of the ARDC, said the closures come as the result of a lack of funds.

On its Facebook page, the nonprofit stated it will release a revised lock schedule for pleasure boater for the rest of the season early next week.

ARDC stated the Armstrong County locks will be open for Labor Day weekend.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.