Allegheny Valley School Board president urges decision on Colfax Elementary’s fate |
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Valley School Board president urges decision on Colfax Elementary’s fate


Allegheny Valley School Board President Larry Pollick wants a decision on Colfax Elementary School’s fate at Monday’s board meeting.

But he knows he may not get one.

“I would hope we would have a clear understanding are where we are with a sale or information on partial or full demolition,” Pollick said.

His expectations apparently were tempered at Tuesday’s board agenda meeting after a discussion about the now-closed Colfax building in Springdale and the possibility of selling or demolishing it.

The cost of demolishing all or part of the old school is the latest obstacle to the board making a decision at Monday’s voting meeting.

Last month, the board decided to have Superintendent Pat Graczyk get an estimate of what partial or full demolition of Colfax would cost.

Graczyk contacted Canzian, Johnston and Associates, an architectural firm, about providing an estimate. Canzian would be paid a fee for that and sign an agreement with the district to do that.

Subsequent questions from the architects regarding the language in that agreement stalled the process somewhat, Graczyk said. It was eventually signed but the Monday timetable for the district receiving the information was delayed, he said.

“I don’t anticipate we’ll have the information on demolition,” Graczyk said of the Monday meeting.

He advised the board the demolition process is complicated because the building likely contains asbestos.

At one point during the board’s discussion an apparently frustrated Pollick vowed the board would vote on the building Monday. But his frustration eased as the discussion progressed.

“We won’t be in position to make any informed vote on the motion as it is listed,” board member Steve Puskar said.

Fellow School Director Antonio Pollino said, “It’s hard to decide whether you demolish part of it or all of it — you need the numbers.”

Graczyk told the board it could authorize the administration to pursue a sale of the building.

However, pursuing and negotiating a sale would be a waste of time if the board finds demolition to be the more viable option.

In addition, while the district pursues the sale it would have to pay for building maintenance, which would cost an estimated $120,000 per year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.