Allegheny Valley School District hopes to sell the former Colfax school building |
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Valley School District hopes to sell the former Colfax school building

Tribune-Review file photo
Allegheny Valley School District officials have decided to sell Colfax Elementary School in Springdale.

The Allegheny Valley School District hopes to sell the recently closed Colfax Upper Elementary School.

The school board on Tuesday reviewed three possible scenarios for the iconic building’s future.

Officials finally agreed to move ahead with the attempt to market and eventually sell the building.

Maintenance for the building is expected to cost $120,000 for the upcoming school year.

“Our taxpayers are paying for an unused building,” said School Director Elizabeth Moretti.

Other scenarios considered were demolishing the building or repurposing the facility.

The site is zoned residential. A buyer wanting to develop something other than housing would have to request a zoning change from Springdale Council.

Solicitor Matthew Hoffman said that an Allegheny County judge would have to give final approval of a sales agreement.

“We once had many school buildings in this district,” said board President Larry Pollick. “We had one turned into a Ponderosa restaurant, and one was turned into a municipal building. Let’s get started and see about getting interest.”

The school board is expected to give final approval to market the building for sale at its meeting on Monday.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.