Apollo man accused of assaulting woman headed to court, some charges dismissed | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo man accused of assaulting woman headed to court, some charges dismissed

Madasyn Czebiniak

A Leechburg judge dismissed felony assault charges against an Apollo man accused of attacking a woman.

James Orlando Oquinn, 29, will head to the Armstrong County Court of Common Pleas on a new felony charge of allegedly strangling the woman, District Judge James Andring ruled Wednesday.

The woman told Apollo police that she had taken Oquinn out for drinks at a bar before the two went to her house, according to a criminal complaint. The woman said she went to the bathroom. When she came into the living room, Oquinn told her that he heard someone laughing, she said to police.

Oquinn allegedly accused the woman of sneaking guys through a window, police said.

After the woman laughed at that suggestion, Oquinn took her into a bedroom where he repeatedly threw her across the room and sexually assaulted her, according to the complaint filed in the case. He continued to try to assault the woman as she tried to get away, police said.

Oquinn originally was charged with two counts of aggravated indecent assault, and sole counts of simple assault, disorderly conduct, and harassment. The aggravated indecent assault charges were thrown out during Oquinn’s preliminary hearing Wednesday. All others were held for court.

Attempts to reach Oquinn’s lawyer Charles Pascal Jr. for comment Friday weren’t successful.

Oquinn remained in the Armstrong County Jail Friday morning after failing to post $25,000 bail.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.