Apollo moves to fill borough official vacancies | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo moves to fill borough official vacancies

George Guido

Following a rash of resignations and redefining positions, Apollo is hoping to move forward after a series of appointments Thursday night.

However, one of the council members resigned Thursday night.

Council members said salaries of Thursday’s appointees have yet to be determined.

Borough council appointed Deanne Shupe as part-time borough secretary/treasurer. Council recently made the position part-time due to budgetary concerns.

Ron Polka was appointed as public works foreman and Brandon Bowersox as meter enforcement officer.

Council hopes to have Bowersox help out in public works on an as-needed basis.

Scott Andreassi of the Charlton & Charlton law firm was appointed solicitor, replacing Timothy Miller. Andreassi is the former Armstrong County district attorney.

CPA Edward Opst will be the borough’s auditor and Andring Services will be in charge of payroll and e-files.

Mayor Cynthia Virostek will be Apollo’s Uniform Construction Code representative and Councilwoman Nancy Walker will be on the Apollo Area Business Association board.

Gabelli resigns

Councilman Dennis Gabrielli resigned, effective Thursday.

Council President John Kautz said interested parties should contact the borough office at 724-478-4201.

Council hopes to appoint Gabrielli’s replacement on Feb. 21.

George Guido is a freelance writer..

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.