Apollo-Ridge and Burrell school districts awarded nearly $50,000 for security equipment | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo-Ridge and Burrell school districts awarded nearly $50,000 for security equipment

Mary Ann Thomas
1187821_web1_web-money8

The Pennsylvania Department of Education awarded a $25,000 Safe Schools Targeted Grant to the Apollo-Ridge School District and nearly $25,000 to the Burrell School District for security equipment.

Apollo-Ridge was among 39 school districts that did not receive other competitive grants from the Department of Education last fall.

Information on other schools receiving the grants is available at the state Department of Education’s web page.

“These vital funds will help our schools invest in equipment and technology to keep our children safe while in school,” said state Rep. Joe Petrarca, D-Washington Township. “It will complement the existing safety tools and resources they currently have in place.”

The grants can be used to purchase security-related equipment including: student, staff and visitor identification systems; metal detectors; protective lighting; special communications equipment; electronic locksets; deadbolts and theft control devices, and training for the security-related technology.

This funding is in addition to the $47.5 million in grants the state School Safety and Security Committee with the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency announced earlier this month.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.