Apollo’s newest full-time police officer is a familiar face | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo’s newest full-time police officer is a familiar face

1730947_web1_web-apollo-121918

An Apollo resident with an extensive resume in law enforcement and even more experience in public service is the borough’s newest full-time police officer.

Council agreed Thursday night to hire Ron Baustert.

Baustert, 57, will begin his duties in about two weeks. He is scheduled to give his retirement notice to Armstrong County 911, where he has served as coordinator for 27 years.

Salary and terms still are being negotiated between council and its police union.

David Romagnoli will remain the officer-in-charge. Former police Chief Jared Kier left the borough several months ago.

Baustert will join the force as a patrolman.

A part-time officer for Apollo during two stints, Baustert will follow in the footsteps of his father, John, as a full-time Apollo officer. He graduated from the police academy in 2002.

He was a part-time police officer in Leechburg for 18 years and with Gilpin for nine years. Baustert plans to remain a part-time officer in Manor Township.

In addition, Baustert has been a volunteer firefighter with Apollo Fire Company No. 2 since 1976.

Council agreed to let Regina Schrecengost, a state corrections officer, do a ride-along with Baustert in the near future.

Trainees for 911 and ambulance crew members have done ride-alongs with Apollo officers in the past.

“I think it’s a valuable cause,” Baustert said. “It lets the public see what we do.”

Apollo police will be getting two new radios in the near future. Starting in mid-January, their old radios, which are compatible with the Windows 7 computer system, will need to hook into Windows 10.

The new radios are $3,300 each.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.