Arnold man accused of punching New Ken police officer in face |
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold man accused of punching New Ken police officer in face

Madasyn Czebiniak

An Arnold man will stand trial on charges that he punched a police officer in the face earlier this month in New Kensington.

Chaz Anthony Hooper, 30, will head to Westmoreland County Court on charges of aggravated assault, resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, defiant trespass and public drunkenness in connection to the July 13 incident. He waived all charges for court during a preliminary hearing on Thursday.

New Kensington police said they received a report that Hooper had assaulted a woman inside the Valley Royal Court county housing facility on Fifth Avenue. The woman told police Hooper choked her and threw her to the ground, according to the criminal complaint filed in the case.

At the time of the incident, Hooper had a no trespassing order from Valley Royal Court, the complaint said.

When police arrived, they found Hooper across the street along Fourth Avenue. Police say he was visibly drunk and yelled at officers when they tried to make contact with him.

Police said Hooper resisted when officers tried to arrest him. Officers managed to handcuff one of his arms. As they attempted to place him in a patrol vehicle, he began pulling away and throwing punches. In his attempt to break free, Hooper punched an officer in the face and right eye, police said. The complaint didn’t state the severity of the officer’s injuries.

Hooper remained in the Westmoreland County Prison on Friday, unable to post $10,000 bail.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.