Arnold man charged with assaulting woman, leaving blood trail to apartment | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold man charged with assaulting woman, leaving blood trail to apartment

Madasyn Lee
1658824_web1_Police-lights

An Arnold man is accused of beating a woman so severely Sunday she left a puddle of blood on a sidewalk, according to police.

Arnold police said they responded to a reported domestic dispute in the 2200 block of Leishman Avenue at about 7:20 p.m.

A caller told police she saw a woman come out of an apartment covered in blood. A man later identified as Clayton Robert Fertig, 52, came outside and allegedly dragged the woman back into the apartment, leaving behind a large puddle of blood on the sidewalk and a trail of blood back into the apartment, according to Fertig’s arrest papers.

Police forced their way into that apartment when no one answered the door, the criminal complaint said.

Inside, police found Fertig “heavily intoxicated” and lying on a bedroom floor, while the woman was lying on the bathroom floor covered in blood, the complaint said.

The woman told police that Fertig got mad at her when he was drinking and punched her in the face multiple times, the complaint said. The woman had a cut on the side of her nose and was bleeding from the back of her head, police said.

Paramedics who treated the woman at the scene told officers that she needed to be taken to the hospital “due to losing consciousness and the severe blood loss,” according to the complaint.

Fertig remained in Westmoreland County Prison in Greensburg on Wednesday because he had not posted $25,000 bond.

He faces a misdemeanor charge of simple assault. A preliminary hearing is set for Sept. 19.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.