Arnold man to serve up to 6 years on drug, gun charges | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold man to serve up to 6 years on drug, gun charges

Rich Cholodofsky
1776280_web1_GavelNewN

An Arnold man pleaded guilty Monday in Westmore­land County Court to drug and gun charges resulting from an arrest two years ago.

Police said that on Sept. 8, 2017, while attempting to arrest Travis James Lasko Jr. on a parole revocation warrant, they found drugs, cash and an unlicensed firearm tucked into a shirt pocket as they dragged him from a car on Drey Street in Arnold.

According to court records, Lasko, 37, became violent as police attempted to make the arrest and, once he was subdued, they found him in possession of four baggies that contained nearly 140 grams of cocaine, more than $5,700 in cash and a pistol.

In court Monday, Lasko pleaded guilty to illegal possession of a firearm, drug possession, resisting arrest and other offenses.

Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway sentenced Lasko to a mitigated sentence of three to six years in prison. The judge said she agreed to a lesser sentence because Lasko has been diagnosed with mental health issues.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.