ShareThis Page
Arnold mayor fined $10,000 for state ethics violations | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold mayor fined $10,000 for state ethics violations

Tom Davidson
1278672_web1_GTR-ElectionHQ003-051919
Arnold Mayor Karen Peconi greets a resident entering a city polling place in this May 21, 2019, file photo.
1278672_web1_vnd-eArnMayor1-xxxxxx
Karen Peconi

Outgoing Arnold Mayor Karen Peconi has been fined $10,000 by the State Ethics Commission for violations of ethics laws during her time as a city official.

The Ethics Commission ruled that Peconi violated state ethics laws when she intervened in her son’s application to the city’s police department and failed to file proper financial statements.

No further action will be taken against Peconi if she complies with paying the fine, the commission said.

The mayor didn’t return messages seeking comment left on her cellphone and was not in her office Tuesday. A city council meeting was set for 7 p.m. Tuesday, and she was expected to attend.

Peconi was defeated in last month’s Democratic primary.

The Ethics Commission found Peconi committed the violations when she used her position as a member of the Arnold Civil Service Board to garner favorable treatment for her son, Wesley, who ultimately was hired in June 2014 by the city as a police officer.

Peconi obtained questions for an oral exam given to candidates for the police force and substituted one of the questions on the test given to her son, which skewed the results and gave him the highest point total possible, the commission found.

As a council member, she lobbied for her son and against the other candidates for the job, attempted to advance his prospects by noting he was the top-scorer on the civil service exam and threatened a lawsuit against the city if he was not hired for the job.

Although she ultimately didn’t cast a vote when her son was hired, she violated state ethics laws with her actions, the commission found.

The commission also found Peconi violated ethics laws when she filed deficient statements of financial interests in 2014, 2015 and 2016 by failing to disclose income from the city and failing to disclose that she worked for Verizon during those years.

Peconi has since filed amended financial interest statements for those year, the commission said.

The fine ultimately will go to the city, but will be paid through the commission so it can be tracked, according to Robert Caruso, the commission’s executive director. As part of a consent agreement between Peconi and the commission, she is not allowed to be reimbursed by the city to cover the cost of the fine.

Arnold solicitor Dave Regoli declined to comment on the matter because he was only made aware of it by the Trib.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected]eb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.