Billboard firm appealing Tarentum’s denial of digital signs near bridge | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Billboard firm appealing Tarentum’s denial of digital signs near bridge

Brian C. Rittmeyer
1131767_web1_web-tarentumbridge3
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
An advertising company doesn’t agree with the decision to deny the firm’s plans to put up a digital billboard at the end of the Tarentum Bridge.

An advertising company is challenging a Tarentum official’s decision to quash the firm’s plans to put up a digital billboard at the end of the Tarentum Bridge.

The borough’s zoning hearing board is scheduled to hear Oliver Outdoor’s appeal this month.

The Butler-based company is appealing zoning officer Anthony Bruni’s determination that the proposed billboard does not comply with borough zoning rules.

The company wants to put up a pole sign with two LED faces.

About 30,000 vehicles cross the bridge each day, PennDOT spokesman Steve Cowan said.

“The short version of this is that a billboard company wants to erect a digital billboard at the end of the Tarentum Bridge in what is designated a commercial center zoned area,” Bruni said. “Based on my interpretation of the borough zoning ordinance, this is not a permitted use of the land.

“I denied their request to install the billboard and they are appealing my decision to the borough’s zoning hearing board.”

A representative of Oliver Outdoor could not be reached for comment.

Borough officials did not respond to requests for more information regarding the company’s proposal.

The public hearing before the Zoning Hearing Board will start at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 29, in council chambers at 318 Second Ave.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.