Brackenridge searches for money to fix collapsed sewer line |
Valley News Dispatch

Brackenridge searches for money to fix collapsed sewer line


Brackenridge officials are considering borrowing money to help pay for emergency repairs to a collapsed storm sewer on Roup Avenue.

Council on Thursday accepted the $106,400 bid of Glenn Johnson Inc. to do the repair work. Johnson’s bid was the lowest of three received in what was the second round of bidding by the borough after council rejected the first bids because it thought they were too high.

Even with the lower bid, the borough is still short on money.

“We have about $50,000 that we can allocate to this project right now, so we are about $56,000 in the hole,” Councilman John Stanzione said.

“I think we should accept this bid at least until we get favorable financing so we don’t lose the bid,” he said.

Council, with Dino Lopreiato and Tim Kolar absent, agreed to accept Johnson’s bid and begin searching for the needed financing, starting with local banks.

Given the cost, it might seem that the line in need of repair is lengthy but that is not the case, according to Stanzione.

He said the line in question is in the 1000 block of Roup and runs down hill, perpendicular to Brackenridge Avenue. He estimated the section of collapsed line is only 10 to 20 feet long.

“But, it’s 25 to 35 feet deep, which means you have to put in shoring to do the repair and it’s between two houses,” Stanzione said.

He said borough officials discovered the problem about five or six weeks ago during one of the recent heavy downpours that saturated the region.

Stanzione said the volume of rain in such a short period led to a heavy flow of water into the storm sewer system. He said as that runoff rushed through the storm water line, it hit the collapsed section on Roup and it was blocked, causing a backup into catch basins that also blew off some manhole covers.

“If it hadn’t been for the storm, we wouldn’t have noticed it,” Stanzione said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.