Bridge project to reduce Greensburg Road to 1 lane in Lower Burrell |
Valley News Dispatch

Bridge project to reduce Greensburg Road to 1 lane in Lower Burrell

Mary Ann Thomas
Madasyn Czebiniak | Tribune-Review
This bridge on Route 366 (Greensburg Road) in Lower Burrell is slated for replacement starting next week.

The 13,000 daily motorists who use Route 366, also known as Greensburg Road, should allot more travel time when a nearly $1 million bridge replacement project begins next week and reduces the busy road to one lane near Millers Lane in Lower Burrell.

Single-lane traffic will be regulated by a temporary traffic light.

The project could start as early as next Wednesday, depending on the weather, and last for about three months, according to Dominec A. Caruso, PennDOT assistant construction engineer.

PennDOT chose to use an alternating lane rather than shut down the road and do both sides at once because of the high traffic volume and the lack of a viable detour in the area, according to PennDOT officials.

During construction, Millers Lane will be closed and a detour will use Pacmil Street to Pacific Avenue.

PennDOT is replacing the crumbling bridge because it is structurally deficient. Built in 1939, the bridge spans an unnamed tributary of Puckety Creek. The contractor, Pugliano Construction of Pittsburgh, will remove the existing 14-foot slab bridge and replace it with a 15-foot-long, precast box culvert.

Workers also will pave up to 200 feet of roadway on each end of the span and 50 feet of nearby Millers Lane.

There also will be minor roadway approach work, drainage and guardrail upgrades, new signs and pavement markings, and utility relocations, according to Caruso.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.