Carrie Fox wins 2 seats on Tarentum Council, her 3rd Ward seat needs to be filled | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Carrie Fox wins 2 seats on Tarentum Council, her 3rd Ward seat needs to be filled

Teghan Simonton
1913206_web1_vnd-carriefox
Carrie Fox

One candidate claimed victory for two different seats on the Tarentum Council on Tuesday.

Carrie Fox was elected to be council member at-large and also to represent the 3rd Ward.

Fox, a Democrat, defeated Republican Tiffany Babinsack for the member at-large position, taking 60.4% of the vote to Babinsack’s 38.1%, according to unofficial tallies.

Fox was simultaneously running unopposed for reelection in her previous position in the 3rd Ward.

“When you run, you take every opportunity you can, any way you can serve this community,” Fox said. “Because I love this community.”

Now that she won both seats, Fox said she will accept the at-large position, which she described as a “new challenge.”

While 3rd Ward represents only the West Tarentum section of town, the at-large position represents Tarentum as a whole.

Her decision leaves the 3rd Ward office open, though. Although the seat received 10 write-in votes Tuesday, protocol states that the spot must now be filled by appointment.

Fox said council members have not yet begun discussions to fill the position.

Fox’s priorities for this term include improving infrastructure, fighting against blight and securing funding for community recreation, which she said is a passion.

“There’s still a lot of work to be done and I’d just like to keep moving forward, doing what’s best for the town.”

Teghan Simonton is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Teghan at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.