ShareThis Page
Cheswick man accused of injuring 9-day-old girl | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Cheswick man accused of injuring 9-day-old girl

Chuck Biedka
1125730_web1_GavelNewN

A Cheswick man is accused of assaulting a baby after the 9-day-old girl was brought to a hospital in February with traumatic injuries.

Joshua Lee Sandusky, 24, of Beech Street, was arraigned Tuesday and accused of causing injury to the girl’s face and legs while the two were in a house in Plum.

According to a Plum police affidavit, the girl had two broken legs as well as abrasions to her chin, nose and forehead and was bleeding when she was taken to UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh.

Police Lt. Lanny Conley said Sandusky changed his story several times when he talked with a detective. At one point, police said, Sandusky told them he set the baby down and was walking to get changing supplies when he “kicked the baby over onto her face.”

Sandusky is charged with aggravated and simple assault, child endangerment and reckless endangerment.

Sandusky was arraigned at 4 a.m. Tuesday. He posted $20,000 bond and is scheduled to appear May 15 for a preliminary hearing before District Judge Linda Inez Zucco.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.