ShareThis Page
Clearfield Township Republican seeks state House 11th District seat in special election | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Clearfield Township Republican seeks state House 11th District seat in special election

Emily Balser
917632_web1_vnd-gregorywalter-032219
Submitted
Gregory Walter

Clearfield Township resident Gregory Walter announced Thursday he will seek the 11th District state House seat in the May 21 special election.

The seat was left empty after former Rep. Brian Ellis resigned earlier this month after allegations came to light he allegedly had sex with a woman against her will while she was unconscious.

Ellis hasn’t been charged. He has denied the allegations through a statement from his attorney.

Walter, 63, is a Republican and ran against Ellis in the 2007 primary.

Walter retired from the U.S. Air Force in 1993 after 21 years. He owns and operates The Barn at Ever Thine, a special event and wedding venue.

“I believe the people of the 11th District deserve someone who is more in touch with their values, needs and wants,” Walter said. “If elected for the position, I would use my business expertise and previous military background to bring necessary changes to Harrisburg.”

Walter and his wife, Laura, have five children and five grandchildren.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, emilybalser@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.