Communities asked to extend sanitary authority for $18M loan |
Valley News Dispatch

Communities asked to extend sanitary authority for $18M loan

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
The offices of the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority in Tarentum on Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2019.

The four communities that founded the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority are being asked to extend its life so the authority can borrow $18 million.

The money would be spent on equipment and infrastructure such as a bigger pump station and lines and a new retention tank to increase the volume of waste the authority’s system can handle and prevent overflows of untreated sewage into the Allegheny River, general Manager Tim Kuhns said.

It is not expected to increase customers’ rates, he said. The authority currently charges $27 per month for the first 2,000 gallons, and then $5.75 for each additional 1,000 gallons.

The authority wants to borrow the $18 million over 30 years, Kuhns said.

To allow for that, elected officials in Brackenridge, East Deer, Harrison and Tarentum are being asked to extend the authority’s life by 50 years, to 2069.

The authority’s life currently goes to 2036.

Tarentum Council is expected to vote when it meets Thursday. It would be the first municipality to approve the extension, Kuhns said.

Tarentum Solicitor David Regoli called the extension “standard” in that the authority wouldn’t be able to borrow money for longer than its life.

The authority serves about 10,000 customers, according to Kuhns. In addition to the four founding municipalities, it also serves customers in Buffalo Township, Fawn and Frazer. Approval from those towns is not required because they are served under contracts with the authority but did not participate in its creation.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.