Dearth of council candidates will plague Cheswick primary election | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Dearth of council candidates will plague Cheswick primary election

Emily Balser
1167848_web1_web-cheswickbuilding

Cheswick voters might be surprised at the number of candidates for council when they enter the voting booth on Tuesday.

Only two people — Republican incumbents Michael Girardi and Brad Yaksich — are running for four open seats.

Three four-year seats and one two-year seat are up for election.

Councilman Bob Kristof and Guila Holtman are not running for re-election on the seven-member council.

Girardi is running for both a four-year and the two-year seat. Yaksich is running for a four-year seat.

David Voye, division manager for the Allegheny County Elections Office, said in cases where there are not enough people running for a seat, 10 write-in votes are needed for a candidate to appear on the November ballot.

In a case where there’s one seat and two write-in candidates, the candidate who received the most votes would win.

In Girardi’s case, he could win nomination and appear on the general election ballot for both seats. When the council reorganizes, Girardi would then choose which seat he would accept. The other seat would be vacant and need to be filled by an appointment.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.