Defense to file new evidence in New Kensington cop-killing case | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Defense to file new evidence in New Kensington cop-killing case

Rich Cholodofsky
1535932_web1_holt
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Rahmael Sal Holt is escorted from District Court Justice Frank Pallone’s office after his preliminary hearing on Wednesday Dec 13, 2017.

Defense attorneys for the man awaiting trial for the 2017 shooting death of New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw will have four weeks to disclose potential evidence that could be used to convince jurors to save his life, a judge said Tuesday.

During a pretrial conference, lawyers for Rahmael Sal Holt, 31, of Harrison, said they have not yet received a report commissioned to find mitigating evidence as to why the death penalty should not be imposed on their client.

Holt did not speak during the hearing before Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway.

He is charged with first-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the Nov. 17, 2017, shooting death of Shaw following a traffic stop in New Kensington.

Police said Holt was a passenger in the stopped vehicle. As he ran from the traffic stop, police said he shot and killed the pursuing Shaw. Holt was arrested and charged after a four-day manhunt.

Defense attorney Tim Dawson said Holt has denied he was the man who fired the shot that killed Shaw.

Westmoreland County prosecutors said they will seek the death penalty against Holt if he is convicted of first-degree murder.

In court Tuesday, Dawson said the defense expects to soon receive the report from the mitigation expert it hired last year, as well as findings by another potential witness who was tasked with analyzing the handwriting on a letter prosecutors claimed Holt wrote to the driver of the vehicle Shaw stopped just before he was killed.

The judge ordered the defense lawyers to turn over both reports to prosecutors by Sept. 10.

Jury selection for Holt’s trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 28. Hathaway in June denied a defense request to select a jury from another county, but said she would reconsider if pretrial publicity makes it impossible to find local residents qualified to hear the case.

Testimony is expected to start Nov. 4.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.